Skapa referens, olika format (klipp och klistra)
Harvard
Strand, J. (2016) Simulation and implementation of strategies to control energy flow through a BESS. Göteborg : Chalmers University of Technology
BibTeX
@mastersthesis{
Strand2016,
author={Strand, Joel},
title={Simulation and implementation of strategies to control energy flow through a BESS},
abstract={This report discusses different strategies for charging and discharging a battery energy
storage system to maximize economic profit. The work is based on the Swedish
energy market. Three strategies are evaluated, first the output minimizing strategy
attempting to minimize the output energy toward the electric grid, second the peak
reduction strategy attempting to minimize the maximum power consumption by
discharging the BESS during peak hours and charging at night time when prices are
low, and third the floating zero strategy trying to keep the output toward the grid
at a certain level based on the local consumption profile.
Simulations show that in an ordinary household the suggested output minimizing
strategy saves 2994 kr yearly for a 12 kWh BESS, 3583 kr for a 24 kWh BESS and
3887 kr for a 48 kWh BESS. The peak reduction strategy saves 2447 kr yearly for
a 12 kWh BESS, 2853 kr for a 24 kWh BESS and 2960 kr for a 48 kWh BESS.
The floating zero strategy saves 2375 kr yearly for a 12 kWh BESS, 3196 kr for
a 24 kWh BESS and 3538 kr for a 48 kWh BESS. Numbers are based on current
energy cost and consumption for an ordinary household and result in a pay off time
of approximately 25 years or greater, depending on system size.},
publisher={Institutionen för energi och miljö, Elteknik, Chalmers tekniska högskola},
place={Göteborg},
year={2016},
keywords={BESS, energy storage, energy flow, charging strategy},
note={38},
}
RefWorks
RT Generic
SR Electronic
ID 240753
A1 Strand, Joel
T1 Simulation and implementation of strategies to control energy flow through a BESS
YR 2016
AB This report discusses different strategies for charging and discharging a battery energy
storage system to maximize economic profit. The work is based on the Swedish
energy market. Three strategies are evaluated, first the output minimizing strategy
attempting to minimize the output energy toward the electric grid, second the peak
reduction strategy attempting to minimize the maximum power consumption by
discharging the BESS during peak hours and charging at night time when prices are
low, and third the floating zero strategy trying to keep the output toward the grid
at a certain level based on the local consumption profile.
Simulations show that in an ordinary household the suggested output minimizing
strategy saves 2994 kr yearly for a 12 kWh BESS, 3583 kr for a 24 kWh BESS and
3887 kr for a 48 kWh BESS. The peak reduction strategy saves 2447 kr yearly for
a 12 kWh BESS, 2853 kr for a 24 kWh BESS and 2960 kr for a 48 kWh BESS.
The floating zero strategy saves 2375 kr yearly for a 12 kWh BESS, 3196 kr for
a 24 kWh BESS and 3538 kr for a 48 kWh BESS. Numbers are based on current
energy cost and consumption for an ordinary household and result in a pay off time
of approximately 25 years or greater, depending on system size.
PB Institutionen för energi och miljö, Elteknik, Chalmers tekniska högskola,
LA eng
LK http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/240753/240753.pdf
OL 30
